Post

O(1,1)

In Math on June 29, 2010 by hoxide

This is too simple to write in a notes, but it is still interesting.
O(p,q) preserve the quadratic form with signature (p,q).

Then what is O(1,1). The conclusion is that O(1,1)\cong \mathbb{R}^+\rtimes ( \mathbb{Z}_2\times \mathbb{Z}_2)

To see this, it is clear that
\begin{pmatrix}\pm 1 & 0 \\ 0& \pm 1\end{pmatrix}
form a subgroup K of O(1,1) isomorphic to \mathbb{Z}_2 \times \mathbb{Z}_2

\lambda \in\mathbb{R}^+ correspond to matrix
\frac{1}{2} \begin{pmatrix}\lambda+\lambda^{-1} &\lambda-\lambda^{-1} \\ \lambda-\lambda^{-1}& \lambda+\lambda^{-1}\end{pmatrix}
which form subgroup N in O(1,1).
K act on N by \lambda \mapsto \lambda^{\det(g)}.

The way to see this is by the consideration of nill-cone In fact, O(p,q) preserve the nill-cone. For O(1,1), the nill-cone is x^2-y^2=0, just two lines. Now let \lambda act by scaler on the line x=y, then the action on the other line has no choice to be scaler by \lambda^{-1}. K just permute the lines or inverse the direction of line. Or we can say O(1,1) \cong \mathbb{R}^\times \rtimes \mathbb{Z}_2 by choice of the permutation between lines.

Advertisement

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.